Legal Opinion

Whyman v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1917No. 8741PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Boulder District Court. Hon. Niel F. Graham, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gaeeigues

Action by defendants in error as petitioners, to partition certain real estate in the city of Boulder. In August, 1883, Benjamin and Sarah Woodbury, being then husband and wife, purchased from one Culver, and by deed of that date, he conveyed to them the premises in question without any statement in the deed as to what their tenancy should be. In October, 1909, she died leaving certain heirs and in January, 1910, he died leaving other heirs. Both died intestate. Bespondent answered claiming that Woodbury and his wife were seized of an estate as tenants in entirety and upon her death that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wells v. CaywoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  2. Mittel v. KarlIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hoffman v. StigersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  4. Meeker v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Baker v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rains v. RainsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. Tader v. TaderWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Dalton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Schimke v. KarlstadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Clark v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API