Legal Opinion

Church v. Campbell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1893No. 1063PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, Clallam Coumly.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

This was an action for damages on an attachment bond. The fourth allegation of the complaint is as follows:

“That after filing said affidavit and before said attachment issued, said John G. Campbell & Co., as required by law, gave an attachment bond for the protection of this plaintiff, with defendants J. L. Worthley and W. TT. Yan Lehn as sureties, in the words and figui-es following:” . . .

There is no allegation in the complaint that the damages claimed to have been sustained have not been paid. At the close of plaintiff’s case the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seattle Crockery Co. v. HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wild Rose Orchard Co. v. CritzerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Rife v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Helmer v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API