Richards v. Warnekros
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. J. E. O’Connor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This is an action brought by appellees to collect three past-due promissory notes. Two of the notes, and realty mortgages to secure them, were executed jointly by appellants, who are husband and wife, and one of the notes and a chattel mortgage to secure its payment were executed by the appellant wife alone. Three separate causes of action are set forth in the complaint, one on each note and mortgage, with prayers for judgment and foreclosure. In addition to the. ordinary allegations in a suit on a promissory note and to foreclose, in the third cause of action (the one based on the note and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Briggs v. . PartridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Stackpole v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Cragin v. LovellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Tucker Manufacturing Co. v. FairbanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith Stage Co. v. EckertArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Arizona Life Insurance v. LindellArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Ness v. Greater Arizona Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Johnson v. YelvertonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Gainok v. FeathersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982