Legal Opinion

Gainok v. Featherson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 22, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4111Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This appeal challenges the trial court’s conclusion that the signer of a promissory note was not personally liable on the note.

Plaintiffs, the Gainoks, agreed to sell their commercial property and business to defendant Glen Sumner, who made the earnest money deposit with a check drawn by defendant Lodema Sellars (aka L. Feather-ston). Before closing, Sumner assigned his interest in the transaction to Sellars. Sel-lars subsequently signed the escrow closing statement as “the buyer.” She also signed a promissory note for $60,210.16, an Arizona Uniform Commercial Code…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pioneer Constructors v. SymesArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Bostwick Banking Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. Best Fertilizers of Arizona, Inc. v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Best Fertilizers of Arizona, Inc. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Kitchell Corporation v. HermansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API