Legal Opinion

Rice v. Lowry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 7, 1919No. 10168Published

Action on bond; from Fulton superior court—Judge JUlis. October 3, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Even if the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial could be considered as anything more than amplifications of the general grounds, not one of them is complete and understandable within itself, or is definite enough to present anything for adjudication by this court. Bowen v. Smith-Hall Grocery Co., 146 Ga. 157 (4) ’(91 S. E. 32); Smiley v. Smiley, 144 Ga. 546 (2) (87 S. E. 668); Bridges v. Griffin, 20 Ga. App. 599 (2) (93 S. E. 170); Southern Ry. Co. v. Williams, 19 Ga. App. 544 (4) (91 S. E. 1001).

2. When this case was first before this court (22 Ga. App. 36, 95 S. E.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smiley v. SmileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Bowen v. Smith-Hall Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Bridges v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Haynie v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API