Legal Opinion · Dissent

Massey v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1993No. S027681Published

1DissentMosk, J.

I dissent.

I cannot agree with the majority’s reasoning. Bearing in mind that the workers’ compensation laws are to be liberally construed on behalf of employees (see post, p. 687), I agree with the view articulated by dissenting Court of Appeal Justice Yegan when that court issued its decision. I adopt Justice Yegan’s opinion and quote it immediately below. My own elisions and substitutions are indicated by brackets.

[. . .] Martin Massey turned 18 on December 15, 1985. During his minority, he was the dependent stepson of decedent Tommy Thompson. Thompson sustained an industrial injury on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ruiz v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Granell v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Arndt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Roblyer v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API