Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Hammond

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 21, 2017No. SJC 12096Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHines, J.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Lenk and Budd, JJ., join). Although I agree that the court properly rejected the defendant’s appeal from the denial of her motion to suppress and other alleged errors, I write separately to express disagreement with the court’s resolution of the defendant’s claim that G. L. c. 6, § 178E (/), is unconstitutional as applied to her. The court spurns the defendant’s constitutional claim, taking the *514position that no due process right is implicated by the defendant’s provision of the registration data to the Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Roe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Doe, SORB No. 380316 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  5. Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API