Commonwealth v. Hammond
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHines, J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Lenk and Budd, JJ., join). Although I agree that the court properly rejected the defendant’s appeal from the denial of her motion to suppress and other alleged errors, I write separately to express disagreement with the court’s resolution of the defendant’s claim that G. L. c. 6, § 178E (/), is unconstitutional as applied to her. The court spurns the defendant’s constitutional claim, taking the *514position that no due process right is implicated by the defendant’s provision of the registration data to the Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Roe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Doe, SORB No. 380316 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.