Legal Opinion

Fish v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1859PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Tipton Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit for fraud and breach of warranty in the sale of a horse. Answer in denial. Jury trial. Judgment for the defendant.

There is but one point in the case. After the jury had retired to their room to consult of their verdict, they sent to the judge information that they desired instruction upon a point. Instead of calling the jury back to the Courtroom, and instructing them in the presence of the parties, the judge, without, it is admitted, intending any wrong, went into their room and gave them instructions in the absence of the parties, and without their consent. This is a practice not to be…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas Midland R.R. Co. v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Commonwealth v. HouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Deming v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Read v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Decker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API