Habel v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment, entered under the provisions of Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, which finally disposed of the entire case. It was submitted on the pleadings and a stipulation as to the facts, which provided that either party might offer additional evidence but no additional evidence was tendered.
Somewhat briefly stated, the material facts are these. Frederick Christian Habel was an employee of the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. and was covered by a *338policy of group insurance issued to that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Prudential Ins. Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Black v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. WoodyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1942
- Turpentine & Rosin Factors, Inc. v. Travelers Ins.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1942