Legal Opinion
Turpentine & Rosin Factors, Inc. v. Travelers Ins.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided May 8, 1942No. Civil Action No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOVETT, District Judge.
The questions for decision in this case arise under a motion filed by defendant for summary judgment and for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rules 56 and 12(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
The suit grows out of a life insurance contract containing benefits for permanent and total disability. It is a group policy. The insured persons are employees and customers of a naval stores factor.
Before considering the motion, I am constrained to comment on the size of the record. In essence, the suit is a simple one at law. The original…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thornton v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davenport v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Pinkerton & Laws, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002