Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hallock v. Donnelly

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1888No. 1288PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Application for mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Leonard, C. J.:

Prior to respondent’s semi-annual settlement with relator, June 11, 1888, the assessor of Eureka county collected 138 poll-taxes of three dollars each; in all four hundred and fourteen dollars. Of this amount relator demands one-half, two hundred and seven dollars, for the state; while respondent claims that it is his official right and duty to retain for Eureka county ten per cent, of the whole amount, to wit, forty one dollars aDd forty cents, and that of the balance the state is entitled to receive one-half, to wit, one hundred and eighty-six dollars and thirty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Cannon's Adm'r v. VaughanTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Thorpe v. SchoolingNevada Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Board of Commissioners v. CutlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Presson v. PressonNevada Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hardy Companies, Inc. v. SNMARK, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State ex rel. Pacific Reclamation Co. v. DuckerNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State ex rel. Abel v. EggersNevada Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API