Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Staton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 19, 2009No. S09G0348Published

1DissentCarley, Presiding Justice

For the reasons set forth in Judge Ellington’s excellent opinion in Staton v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., 294 Ga. App. 208 (669 SE2d 164) (2008), I believe that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be affirmed in its entirety. Accordingly, I must respectfully dissent to the majority’s opinion reversing that judgment and reinstating the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the insurer. The result reached today deprives Staton of his right to stack the limits of all of the available uninsured motorist coverage provided by the policies as properly construed by the Court of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ford v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Staton v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API