Legal Opinion

Ford v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1989No. A89A0160PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Chief Judge.

Prior to 1980, an injured party was allowed to stack multiple uninsured motorist coverages if the tortfeasor was totally uninsured but an injured party was not allowed to do so if the tortfeasor was merely underinsured. See Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Austin, 143 Ga. App. 309 (238 SE2d 253) (1977). In 1980, the legislature amended OCGA § 33-7-11 (b) (1) (D) so as to redefine “uninsured motor vehicle.” The courts have since construed this redefinition of “uninsured motor vehicle” as evidencing a legislative intent to extend the right to stack multiple uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Moss v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. Lewis v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beard v. NunesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Continental Insurance v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Hall v. Regal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Staton v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Dunn-Craft v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API