Legal Opinion
In re the Niagara, Lockport & Ontario Power Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCheney, J.
This is a proceeding in condemnation instituted under section 624 of the Conservation Law (added by Laws of 1921, chap. 579, as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 242). Issues were raised and the case was tried and judgment of condemnation granted. (125 Mise. 269.) By that judgment commissioners were appointed, who have viewed the property, heard the testimony of the parties, and have made their report wherein they find that the value of the property and rights taken is $15,000, and have awarded that sum to the property owners. The mot'.on to confirm this award is now before the court.
Section 15 of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- McGovern v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HoblittMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Niagara, Lockport & Ontario Power Co. v. HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Board of Supervisors v. Sherlo Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Home Gas Co. v. MilesNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- In re the Creation of the West Great Falls Flood Control & Drainage District ex rel. GreenwoodMontana Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.