Legal Opinion

Bradley Gillespie v. Darcie Holthaus, et al.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 13, 2026No. 5:25-cv-03265Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS BRADLEY GILLESPIE, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 25-3265-JWL DARCIE HOLTHAUS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Bradley Gillespie is hereby required to show good cause, in writing to the undersigned, why his Eighth Amendment claim and his First Amendment claims based on the lack of library access, should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Court finds that the proper processing of Plaintiff’s mail censorship claim and retaliation claim cannot be achieved without additional information from appropriate KDOC…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API