Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bowles

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1933No. [No. 108, October Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Washington County, dated August 16th, 1932, adjudging the appellant guilty of contempt of that court. The contempt was found to be the filing by the appellant in the Circuit Court for Washington County of a paper entitled, “Motion and affidavit,” in the following language: “Comes now the plaintiff Borman S. Bowles, and moves the court to certify the above-entitled cause to another Judge other than the Honorable Prank G-. Wagaman, and for reasons says: That he does not believe that he can obtain a fair and impartial trial before the said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Merrimack River Savings Bank v. City of Clay CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Coons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Edwardsen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Baltimore Building & Construction Trades Council v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Surratt v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API