Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Emily Enterprises, Inc.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 2001No. 2000-SC-1030-WCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Based upon a finding that the claimant’s anxiety and depression were associated with his work-related back injury and his employer’s failure to promptly provide medical care for the injury, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) determined that expenses incurred for treating the anxiety and depression were compensable. Reversing a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) that had affirmed the award, the Court of Appeals determined that the mental conditions were not a direct result of the back injury and concluded that because they did. not come within the definition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holland v. Childers Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Dunn v. Central State HospitalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Beech Creek Coal Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Beech Creek Coal Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McManus v. Kentucky Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. JobeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Sweeney v. Kerstens & Lee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Coleman v. Emily Enterprises, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API