Legal Opinion

Klaniecki Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1959No. Appeal, 28PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

This is an unemployment compensation case in which the Board of Keview refused claimant compensation on the ground that she voluntarily terminated her employment under section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b), when she resigned in accordance with a company policy wMch forbids female employes to work beyond the sixth month of pregnancy.

Claimant was employed as a chemist by the Pittsburgh Coke and Chemical Company, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The record shows that established company policy did not permit female employes to work beyond the sixth month…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Campbell Soup Co. v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Smith v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Rzepski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Douglas Aircraft Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Boeing Co. v. Kansas Employment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Douglas Aircraft Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API