Legal Opinion

Davis v. Redstone Federal Credit Union

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 26, 1980No. 79-96PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the question of whether federal credit unions are exempt from the provisions of the Alabama Consumer Credit Act (the Mini-Code, §§ 5-19-1, et seq., Code 1975). Specifically, the issue is whether the Mini-Code’s provision which limits recovery of attorney’s fees to 15% of the unpaid debt will apply to a federal credit union loan. The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, in Davis v. Redstone Federal Credit Union, 401 So.2d 49 (Ala.Civ.App., 1979), held that the Mini-Code was preempted by the extensive federal regulations which govern federal credit unions. We reverse.

The doctrine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neal v. Redstone Federal Credit UnionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Davis v. Redstone Federal Credit UnionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API