Davis v. Redstone Federal Credit Union
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
This case involves the question of whether federal credit unions are exempt from the provisions of the Alabama Consumer Credit Act (the Mini-Code, §§ 5-19-1, et seq., Code 1975). Specifically, the issue is whether the Mini-Code’s provision which limits recovery of attorney’s fees to 15% of the unpaid debt will apply to a federal credit union loan. The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, in Davis v. Redstone Federal Credit Union, 401 So.2d 49 (Ala.Civ.App., 1979), held that the Mini-Code was preempted by the extensive federal regulations which govern federal credit unions. We reverse.
The doctrine…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Neal v. Redstone Federal Credit UnionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Davis v. Redstone Federal Credit UnionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981