Legal Opinion

United States v. Sheridan-Kirk Contract Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 4, 1906No. 620PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Submitted on Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

The indictment was found under the act of Congress of August 1, 1893 (27 Stat. 340, c. 352 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3531]), entitled “An act relating to the limitation of the hours of daily service of laborers and mechanics employed upon the public works of the United States and of the District of Columbia,” which provides as follows:

“That the service and employment of all laborers and mechanics who are now or may hereafter be employed by the government of the United States, by the District of Columbia] or by any contractor or subcontractor upon any of the public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. GuiterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Young v. HendricksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Jones v. O'BRYONSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  4. State ex rel. Finnegan v. Lincoln Dairy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. HofrichterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API