Legal Opinion
Progressive Distribution Services, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided May 16, 2016No. Case No. 1:14-CV-430PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON J. QUIST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff, Progressive Distribution Services, Inc. (Progressive), has sued several Defendants in the United Parcel Services family of companies (collectively referred to herein as UPS) alleging that UPS is liable for trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq., and the common law. Progressive also alleges that UPS violated the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (MCPA), M.C.L.A. § 445.901 et seq.. *746All of Progressive’s claims arise out of UPS’s use of Progressive’s federally-registered trademark…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Geomatrix, LLC v. NSF InternationalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Geomatrix, LLC v. NSF InternationalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- PLIXER INTERNATIONAL INC v. SCRUTINIZER GMBHDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- Rohn v. Viacom International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017