Legal Opinion

Rolleston-Daines v. Estate of Hopiak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 29, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarpinello, J.

Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Relihan, Jr., J.), entered August 5, 1998 in Tompkins County, which, inter alia, determined the amount of quantum meruit recovery due to plaintiff.

Plaintiff, a friend and colleague of nature photographer Michael J. Hopiak (hereinafter decedent) who died intestate in September 1994, seeks to recover $30,400 from defendant for services she provided between September 6, 1995 and January 26, 1996. During this time period, plaintiff reviewed and organized slides of decedent’s photographic work pursuant to an April 1995 proposal she had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Taylor & Jennings, Inc. v. Bellino Bros. Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Smith v. Brocton Preserving Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caribbean Direct, Inc. v. Dubset LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Thompson v. HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Caribbean Direct, Inc. v. Dubset LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API