Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Woodside v. Seaboard Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1966No. Appeal, No. 14PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

The facts in this case are clearly set forth in Commonwealth ex rel. Woodside v. Seaboard Mutual Casualty Company, 415 Pa. 72, 202 A. 2d 42 (1964). It was there held that the judgments obtained in actions against the Peoples Cab Company “were proper judgments against Seaboard’s insured; Seaboard as insurer was responsible for the amounts of the judgments even though payment thereof was now to proceed through the liquidation proceedings and not by writ of attachment.” (Emphasis supplied).

Appellants now urge that they are entitled to be paid in full the face amount…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reliance Building & Loan Ass'n CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Woodside v. Seaboard Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foster v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Koken v. Colonial Assurance Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API