Legal Opinion

Weaver v. . Hampton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 25, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

The two primary questions of law presented by the record are:

1. Has the clerk of the Superior Court the power to sign a consent judgment in a cause duly instituted in the Superior Court, and at the time of such signing, pending before a referee appointed in an order of compulsory reference?

2. Does the board of county commissioners have the power to compromise a pending suit against the county, or to assent to the entry of a consent judgment terminating litigation against the county?

The evidence in the case is conflicting. Nevertheless, it discloses that a serious controversy existed between…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. West v. Coos CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McNeill v. . LawtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Weaver v. . HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Edwards v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Sharp v. GulleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API