Legal Opinion
Hoskins v. Ertl
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 18, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00873Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JAMES HOSKINS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-873-bhl CHRISTOPHER ERTL, et al., Defendants. SCREENING ORDER Plaintiff James Hoskins, who is currently in custody at the Wisconsin Resource Center and representing himself, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. §1983, alleging that his civil rights were violated. This matter comes before the Court on Hoskins’ motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the full filing fee and to screen the amended complaint. Dkt. Nos. 2 & 6. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burks v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.