Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Danforth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 1990No. 01693Published

1DissentKelly, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm judgment of sentence imposed for appellant’s conviction of drunk driving. I would not address the constitutionality of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 1547(a)(2), as I find that appellant’s express consent was voluntary and valid, and so would find recourse to statutory implied consent unnecessary to uphold the search (by blood test) challenged here. Nonetheless, as the majority base their disposition of this appeal on that ground, I shall commence my dissent by explaining my views on the implied consent issue, before proceeding to explain, at length, why I disagree with…

2Cases cited102 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API