Citizens Bank v. Oaks
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Howell County Circuit Court. — Eon. W. N. Evans, Judge. If there is no substantial evidence to support the verdict, the judgment will be reversed. Sec. 2083, R. S. 1909; Joy v. Cale, 124 Mo. App. 569; Bretzf elder v. Waddle, 122 Mo. App. 462; Turner v. Haar, 114 Mo. 335; Berning v. Medart, 56 Mo. App. 443; Richardson v. Drug Co., 92 Mo. App. 515.
1Opinion of the Court
STURGIS, 'J.
The plaintiff sues on the following written instrument, designated by the parties and for convenience here as a note: “West Plains, Mo., Dec. 18, 1911. On or before January 2, 1912. I hereby promise to pay to the Citizens Bank of Pomona, Mo., the sum of two hundred and eighty-six dollars ($286) *600being amount of balance dne to said bank by one W. A. Wible. Signed, Eugene Oaks.” Tbe petition alleges that this written promise was made and taken because one W. A. Wible owed the plaintiff the amount specified therein which was insufficiently secured and was then due; that defendant’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fuller v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Fitzgerald v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Houck v. FrisbeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
- Beh v. BaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Calhoun v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Connersville Casket Company v. GistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. KuhnNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Paxon v. Kregel Casket Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1928