Houck v. Frisbee
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Cape Girardeau Court of Common Pleas. Hon. Alexander Ross, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
In 1893 the firm of Johnson & Stout bought from Greorge Houck and the plaintiff the timber on a section of land in New Madrid county. *17They agreed to give George Houck $500 for his interest, for which they gave their note; and for the plaintiff’s interest they agreed to pay $1,000, for which they also executed their note, dated April 15, 1893, and payable on the tenth day of January, 1894. During the summer and autumn of 1893 the firm of Goldsmith & Page were engaged in sawing lumber, and the defendant was a dealer in lumber in the city of Dexter. During that year negotiations were opened…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- County of Montgomery v. AuchleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- MacDonald v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Wulze v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by18 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. FeutzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Peterson v. Miller Rubber Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Chenoweth v. Pacific Express Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Garden v. HainesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Montgomery v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.