Harmon v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 41 — PETITION EQUITY cited 8 B. M., 169; 3 B. M., 74; 9 B. M., 337; 3 GreenL, sec. 171; 1 B. M., 385, 333; 9 B. M., 397; Pars. Mer. L., 106; 3 Dana, 557; Story on Bills, sec. 369. cited Story on Bills, 369. cited Smith’s Mer. L., 303; 7 Mon., 580; 3 B. M., 363; 3 Marsh., 153; 3 Litt., 185; 1 /. /. M., 70 ; 10 Peters, 573 ; 3 Howard, 457.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE WILLIAMS
delivered the opinion op the codrt :
These causes having been consolidated by order of court, on the appellant’s motion, there was no error in trying both at the same time, and pronouncing one judgment, had it correctly defined the rights of each party; but it was erroneous to pronounce a joint judgment against Daniel Harmon and Robert Harmon, when each, if liable at all, is liable upon two separate bills of exchange, to one of which Daniel is no party, and to the other Robert is no party; besides, these bills are for different sums.
The bill drawn by Daniel Harmon, dated July 3,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Commomwealih v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Noble v. People's Stock & Poultry Feed Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920