Legal Opinion

State v. Emonds

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1919No. 15236PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered September 28, 1918, upon a trial and conviction of violating the state-wide prohibition law.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The defendant, a regularly licensed physician, was charged by the information with the crime of issuing a prescription for intoxicating liquor after he had been twice convicted of unlawfully issuing such prescriptions. The trial resulted in a verdict of guilty. From the judgment entered on the verdict, the appeal is prosecuted.

Section 8 of Initiative Measure No. 3, Laws of 1915, page 6 (Rem. Code, § 6262-8), among other things, provides that it shall be unlawful for a physician, after he has been convicted a second time of a violation of any of the provisions of the act, to thereafter write…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SheaWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Heavey v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. AplinWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Luders v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API