Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. McLaughlin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1878No. 123PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

The case before us was originally an action to recover possession of land, brought in the proper court of the State of California.

The plaintiff proved a patent from the United States to the Western Pacific Railroad Company, and a conveyance by said company to him of the land in dispute. In conformity to the practice in the courts of California, the defendant, Ferguson, filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill in equity, which alleged that while' plaintiff had the apparent legal title, he held it, or should be decreed to hold it, for the benefit of the , defendant. The ground of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sherman v. BuickSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. HowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Turner v. Cargo of Resawn Pitch Pine Timber & LumberDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API