Legal Opinion

Great Northern Railway Co. v. Hower

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 1915No. 88PublishedCited by 11 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. The facts, which involve the construction of Rev. Stat., § 2291, and the necessity of the homesteader making improvements on the land entered, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. The facts, which involve the construction of Rev. Stat., § 2291, and the necessity of the homesteader making improvements on the land entered, are stated in the opinion. In Moore v. Roibbins, 96 U. S. 530, 535; Baldwin v. Stark, 107 U. S. 463; Boháll v. Dilla, 114 U. S. 47; Lee v. Johnson, 116 U.'S. 48; Gonzales v. French, 164 U. S. 342, relied on by plaintiff in error, the patent of the United States was supported against an attempt to set it aside, and in none of these cases had the right of a bona fide purchaser intervened. In this…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

The Great N or them Railway Company filed its amended complaint against James A. Hower, individually and as Trustee, Anna H. Hower, his wife, Nonpareil Consolidated Copper Company, Nicholas H. Rudebeck, and James McCreery Realty Company, in the Superior Court of the' State of Washington, in and for the county of Snohomish, seeking to establish title to the northeast quarter of Section 2, Township 27 north, Range 10 east, Willamette Meridian, in said county and State. Defendants appeared and demurred upon the ground, among others, that the amended complaint did not state facts sufficient to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silver v. LaddSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Ard v. BrandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Lindsey v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. United States v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Krueger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. United States v. PolandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Davis v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Nadler v. California Veterans BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API