Legal Opinion

McNiff v. Lapiskey, 92-143 (1996)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 31, 1996No. C.A. No. 92-143Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

Before this Court is the appeal of William and Mary J. McNiff from a decision of the Town of Narragansett Zoning Board of Review which denied their application for a variance Jurisdiction is pursuant to G.L. 1956 (1991 Reenactment) §45-24-69.

Facts and Travel

William and Mary J. McNiff (appellants or McNiffs) own property in the Town of Narragansett consisting of three lots designated as Lots 507, 508, and 509 on Tax Assessor's Plat N-F. Lot 507 measures sixty-six feet wide by one hundred feet long and contains a single-family dwelling owned by the appellants. Lots 508 and 509 each…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Caswell v. George Sherman Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  2. Apostolou v. GenovesiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  3. Destefano v. Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  4. Viti v. Zoning Board of Review of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960
  5. R.J.E.P. Associates v. HellewellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API