Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williamson v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 2004No. A-03-987Published

1DissentCarlson, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that the trial court was correct in its conclusion that Williamson *654should be denied benefits in that he did not give notice as required by § 48-133. A review of the entire record dictates a conclusion that Williamson gave Werner notice “as soon as practicable.”

In its order denying Williamson benefits, the trial court made a finding that Williamson’s “back injuries and complaints [were] causally linked to the December 23, 2000, accident.” The court also found that “the first notice of injury supported by any credible evidence occurred in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Phelan-Shirley Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Travelers Insurance v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Selders v. Cornhusker Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Jackson v. Morris Communications Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Price v. Burlington Refrigerator Express Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API