Legal Opinion

State v. Wika

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1998No. Criminal 970267PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] The ’ State appeals from the trial court’s denial of its Rule 35(a), N.D.R.Crim. P., motion to correct an illegal sentence. We reverse the order denying the motion, vacate the illegal sentence, and remand for correction.

[¶ 2] Defendant Daniel Ray Wika was charged and pled guilty to terrorizing and aggravated assault, both class C felonies. Wika admitted to slashing a woman with a butcher knife, creating a four-inch slash, plus a quarter-inch puncture wound. Before Wika pled guilty, the State filed an amended information, giving the trial court and Wika notice of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. State v. TriebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. NaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. RuebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HatlewickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. WhiteColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Gussiaas v. NeustelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. HutchinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API