State v. Armadore
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
The defendant, Darius Armadore, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a). On appeal, the defendant claims (1) that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the state's motion to join his case with the case of his codefendant, Gerjuan Rainer Tyus; (2) that he was deprived of his constitutional right to confrontation when the state's firearms examiner was permitted to testify regarding the findings of another firearms examiner, who was deceased and thus unavailable to testify at trial; (3) that he was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ArmadoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- State v. TyusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- State v. CruzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024