Legal Opinion
State v. Murphy
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1983No. 18814Published
1Opinion of the Court
674 P.2d 1220 (1983)
STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Vance MURPHY, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 18814.
Supreme Court of Utah.
October 31, 1983.
Martin W. Custen, Ogden, for defendant and appellant.
David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Earl F. Dorius, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.
HALL, Chief Justice:
Appellant owned and operated a business known as "The Store" in Ogden, Utah. On August 8, 1981, an undercover agent for the Ogden City Police Department entered The Store and purchased a package of rolling papers labelled "Reefer Rollers" from a store employee.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- William Stoianoff D/B/A the Joint Effort, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Levas and Levas, D/B/A Levas T-Shirts v. Village of Antioch, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.