Legal Opinion

Kilgore v. Union Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1931No. 6 Div. 851PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The action is by the surety on an official bond against the principal to recover attorneys’ fees incurred and paid by the surety in defense of damage suits brought against principal and surety on the bond.

The action is based on an indemnity covenant or agreement incorporated in.the application to the bonding company, and which reads: “ * * * in consideration of the Union Indemnity Company executing the bond herein applied for or any continuation thereof I do hereby covenant, promise and agree to pay the premium or fees hereinafter agreed upon, viz., Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per annum in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Wilson v. OrrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Ireland v. Linn County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Morrison v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Perkins v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Jackson v. HollowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FalkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Mitchell v. McGuireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Sentry Insurance v. Davison Fuel & Dock Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API