Legal Opinion
People v. Clark
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contentions of defendant on appeal from his conviction of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (15 counts), grand larceny in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts). Because the People announced their readiness within six months of commencement of the action and are not chargeable with any periods of postreadiness delay (see, People v McKenna, 76 NY2d 59, 64; see generally, People v Kendzia, 64 NY2d 331, 337), defendant was not deprived of his right to a speedy trial.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. McKennaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. HernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. StraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Kamani K.L. (Jasmine D.Q.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Matter of Kamani K.L. (Jasmine D.Q.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- People v. StraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.