Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Quick & Reilly, Inc. & Davidson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 19, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Williams, J.), entered September 2, 1983 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR 7503 to compel arbitration between the parties. II The issue presented for resolution in the case at bar is whether Special Term properly determined that petitioner’s first, second, fourth and fifth causes of action allege common-law causes of action and are arbitrable pursuant to the arbitration clause contained in the parties’ option agreement. We conclude that Special Term correctly ruled that those…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In Re the Arbitration Between Prinze & JonasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Mulligan v. LackeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Harris v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Harris v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris v. IannacconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Estate of GatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Litz v. Town Board of GuilderlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cadlett v. St. John's Episcopal HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987