Edison Electric Light Co. v. Mather Electric Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Appeal from Clerk’s Taxation of Costs as to Examiners’ Fees. Under the head of “Examiners' Fees” the complainants presented the following items for taxation, yiz.: Examiners’ fees: (5 days occupied (a] if3.................... 18 00 8 exhibits filed &.identified @ 25 cents......................' 2 00 (5 witnesses sworn @ 10 cents....................'.......... 00 412 fol. evidence taken @ 20c.............................. 88 40 Examiners’ & typewriters’ fees for…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Clerk’s Taxation of Costs as to Examiners’ Fees. Under the head of “Examiners' Fees” the complainants presented the following items for taxation, yiz.: Examiners’ fees: (5 days occupied (a] if3.................... 18 00 8 exhibits filed &.identified @ 25 cents......................' 2 00 (5 witnesses sworn @ 10 cents....................'.......... 00 412 fol. evidence taken @ 20c.............................. 88 40 Examiners’ & typewriters’ fees for do...................... 84 00 192 60 The clerk taxed the bill as follows, viz.: 6 days occupied @…
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
The practice in this circuit is to chárge 30' cents per folio and $3 per day in such cases, the same being intended to cover both examiner’s and stenographer’s fees. Let this bill of costs be taxed accordingly. No costs to be taxed on this motion.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Tesla Electric Co. v. ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. LockwoodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904
- American Bank Protection Co. v. City Nat. Bank of JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1913