Legal Opinion
Behunin v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 21, 1986No. Civ. A. 86-K-281PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
This case involves the Dow product Sara-bond, purported to increase the bond strength between brick and mortar. Sara-bond permits the economical and expeditious off-site pre-fabrication of brick panels. Plaintiffs contend, in their February 18, 1986 complaint, Sarabond causes severe corrosion of metal girders to which it is exposed. Among plaintiffs’ theories of recovery are strict products liability, negligence, fraud and violation of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act (RICO). Compensatory, punitive and treble damages are sought. I exercize…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- International Business Machines Corp. v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ORSON H. GYGI CO., INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Milford Power Ltd. v. New England Power Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- The Chronicle Publishing Co. v. James P. Hantzis, Appeal of Robert E. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Quark, Inc. v. Power Up Software Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Chronicle Publishing Co. v. HantzisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.