Legal Opinion

Quark, Inc. v. Power Up Software Corp.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 4, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-B-701PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Defendants move for the admission pro hac vice of Andrew P. Bridges (Bridges) of the law firm Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati (Wilson, Sonsini). Plaintiff objects, contending that the entire Wilson, Sonsini firm must be disqualified under ethics rules governing client confidences and conflict of interest. The issue is adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially aid its resolution. The parties have also submitted extensive affidavits concerning the factual matters raised by this motion. Because a member of the Wilson, Sonsini firm represented…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leon G. Smith and Karen H. Smith v. D. Keith Whatcott, Phillip Taylor, Taywin, Inc., Taycor Ltd. And Burke ClowardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Sierra Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1987
  3. Behunin v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Religious Technology Center v. F.A.C.T.Net, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
  3. Andrea L. Richard, Wsb No. 5-2848 v. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State BarWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Banks v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  5. In Re GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API