Legal Opinion

Harlan v. Willard

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1921No. Civ. No. 3489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Rupert B. Turnbull, Turnbull, Heffron & Kelley and Ralph Woods Pontious for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiff by the judgment herein was determined to be the owner of one-half of the property of the estate of C. A. Willard, deceased. It was decreed that defendants held the same in trust for her benefit. Prom that judgment this appeal is taken.

In 1901 the plaintiff was employed as a waitress in a restaurant and was then twenty years of age. 0. A. Willard was then of the age of forty-one years. Prior to his acquaintanceship with the plaintiff he had been married and divorced and there were two children of that marriage, to wit, Edgar H. Willard and Dorothea Laura Blodgett, appellants here.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walsh v. WescoattWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wurche v. StenzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API