Legal Opinion
Katzman v. Victoria's Secret Catalogue
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 29, 1996No. 96 Civ. 0003 (RWS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
Courtroom Television Network (“Court TV”) has moved to be heard, either pursuant to General Local Rule 7 of this Court (“Rule 7”) or through a motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 24, Fed.R.Civ.P., to seek permission to televise an oral argument to be held on May 1,1996, on the motion of Defendants, Victoria’s Secret Catalogue, Leslie H. Wex-ner, Edward G. Razek, Cynthia Fedus, and Betsy Hendrickson (collectively, “Victoria’s Secret” or “Defendants”), to dismiss the Amended Complaint and on the motion of Plaintiff Denise Katzman (“Katzman”) to amend the Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Collette v. St. Luke's Roosevelt HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- People v. BossNew York Supreme Court · 2000
- Courtroom Television Network LLC v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.