Legal Opinion

Thomas F. Reilly & Co. v. Scheer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 19, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant. There was no proof to support this, and the court did not submit the case to the jury on. this theory. The plaintiff furnished its materials for the contractor who was to build the garage for the defendant. Therefore, the plaintiff could not recover unless the proof showed that the defendant owed the contractor money; and if the owner spent more in completing the work than…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wexler v. RustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. Behrer v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Schenectady County Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Grossman Bros. & Rosenbaum v. Dunaif Building Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. W. Van Cott & Son v. GallonNew York County Court, Delaware County · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API