Legal Opinion

Grossman Bros. & Rosenbaum v. Dunaif Building Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of the Bronx, second district, entered upon a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiffs are subcontractors who performed certain work on a building owned by the defendant Danaif Building Company, and have recovered a judgment against that company in a mechanic’s lien action. The plaintiffs’ evidence consisted of proof that the work was performed by them under a. subcontract from Greenberg & Schlechter, Incorporated; that Greenberg and Schlechter had a parol contract to do the iron work on the building; that the price for the general contract was- $2,500, and that the general contract was completed. The plaintiffs did not ask their witness when the payments became…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Clief v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Conkling v. . WeatherwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Keavey v. De RagoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  4. Ebling v. NekardaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FeeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  2. Thomas F. Reilly & Co. v. ScheerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API