Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Sprague

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1969No. Civ. 8970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of non-suit in a medical malpractice action arising out of an operation performed by defendant on plaintiff for the removal of the lesser saphenous vein.

The question is whether there was sufficient evidence to require the case to be submitted to the jury under a conditional res ipsa loquitur instruction.

A nonsuit may be granted “ . . . . only when, disregarding conflicting evidence, and giving to plaintiff’s evidence all the value to which it is legally entitled, indulging in every legitimate inference which may be drawn from that evidence, the result is a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Meier v. Ross General HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berkey v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Clemens v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Sammons v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Adams v. LeidholdtColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Tobler v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API