Legal Opinion

State v. Oetken

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 6, 2000No. 99-364PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of second-degree burglary and adjudicated an habitual offender. He now appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, the propriety of the jury instructions, the jurisdiction of the trial court, and the effectiveness of counsel. We find no reversible error. The decision of the district court is affirmed.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings

On September 25,1998, defendant, Ryan Oetken, was indicted on two counts of burglary in the second degree in violation of Iowa Code sections 713.1 and 713.5(1) (1997). Defendant was also alleged to be an habitual…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. State v. MagheeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. State v. PaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. State v. TrudoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. State v. KelloggSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. BrueggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. State of Iowa v. Kevin Deshay AmbroseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  4. State of Iowa v. Orlando David RodriguezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  5. State v. PollySupreme Court of Iowa · 2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API