Legal Opinion

Sanco Finance Company v. Canon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1964No. 40477PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Vice Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, Sanco Finance Company, filed a petition alleging that defendants for a good and valuable consideration executed *818and delivered to plaintiff their promissory-note in the amount of $856.08, that defendants failed to pay according to the terms of the note, and that there was due the sum of $500 plus interest and attorney’s fees. Defendants (John B. Canon, Mrs. J. B. Canon, and Paul Canon) answered, admitting that they executed the note “promising to pay certain sums of money”, and alleging that “ * * * defendants were willing and able to pay to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. BoydstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Deming Inv. Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sunrizon Homes, Inc. v. American Guaranty Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Oklahoma National Bank v. Equitable Credit Finance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Sunrizon Homes, Inc. v. American Guaranty Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API